Blog powered by Typepad

April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Blogs I read

Websites to check out

« This is a test | Main | When I became a Christian »



>>scriptures were never intended to be read in isolation - they are a book for the community to be read in community.

Did these "wise friends" (do hope you're not referring to the Bible in 2 Years zoomer scriptura wingnuts!) offer any evidence for that opinion? The reformers surely thought that *everyone* should read The Bible, which in no way makes reading any less of a solitary activity; I think people often lack the courage and honesty to go with scripture and conscience, and are attracted to the (heretical) idea that popular=right. Party lines are exactly that. Strange that nominal Sola Scriptura types , rejecting Magisterium, become worshippers of Community 'Reading' (although there's lots of inadvertent comedy in the exegis=what me and my mates do, eisegis=what heretical others do arrogant nonsense)


Hi Ryan - good to hear from you!

Sorry if I didn't make myself clear: I don't mean to say that we shoudn't read the bible alone - of course we should. But I was higlighting the importance of reading with others: both as a source of encouragement and accountability, but also because of the community nature which was often the original intention of much of scripture - i.e. much of it was letters, prophecies etc about a particular community for a particular community. If we don't recognise that then we are in risk of doing the eisegesis of which you are wary (and rightly so!).

The comments to this entry are closed.